The human microbiome is a vast frontier of known and unknown microscopic creatures carrying out untold biochemical transformations for metabolic pathways we have yet to map out.
Trillions of microbes—including bacteria, viruses, and fungi—interact with human physiology, outnumbering human cells. Most microbes are “friendly,” and among their functions is keeping the disease-causing pathogenic ones from creating problems. Pathogenic bugs occasionally cause acute illnesses and play a role in chronic diseases.
Research is rapidly cataloging various microbial demographics associated with diseases such as autism spectrum disorder, Parkinson’s disease, Crohn’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, various cancers, cardiovascular disease, and others.
Against a backdrop of increasing disease rates, the concept of a healthy microbiome seems like a possible elixir. Maybe that’s why so many are embracing radical concepts such as fecal transplants that use donor stool to repopulate good gut bacteria or even a synthetic microbiome made up of microbes grown in a lab.
The past year has brought developmental leaps in both methods, as science attempts to outpace the destruction of the microbiome, which has seen entire families of bacteria disappear from the guts of industrialized populations.
A Snapshot of the Science
Stanford University researchers have developed what they call “the most complex and well-defined synthetic microbiome” with more than 100 bacterial species that they then transplanted into mice. After two months, 98 percent of the flora colonized in the mice and remained stable. The results were published in September 2022 in the journal Cell.“So much of what we know about biology, we wouldn’t know if it weren’t for the ability to manipulate complex biological systems piecewise,” said Michael Fischbach, corresponding author on the study and associate professor of bioengineering, microbiology, and immunology.
Microbiologist Kiran Krishnan told The Epoch Times that synthetic microbiomes will be beneficial for research, but he doesn’t think a whole human microbiome will be successfully replaced with a manmade version in his lifetime. Any attempt, he said, would likely end up like baby formula—a crude imitation that companies attempted to convince moms was better than breast milk—now associated with increased risks of obesity, allergies, and immune dysfunction.
“We cannot replicate what microbes do naturally. It’s too hard. There are mechanisms going on in the world of microbes that we don’t even understand from a biologist’s perspective,” Mr. Krishnan said. “Then you get into the whole world of quantum biology—microbes communicating in ways we don’t even know exist. Anytime we’ve thought we could outsmart nature, we’ve created problems.”
FMT Application Outside the Gut
Beyond C. diff infections, the FDA limits fecal transplants to clinical studies. Researchers are investigating FMT use with dozens of other infections, diseases, and conditions.During a Malibu microbiome meeting several months ago, Dr. Borody presented case studies of success using transplants for constipation in conjunction with Parkinson’s disease. Not only did two patients experience relief from constipation, but tremors and other symptoms also vanished, Dr. Borody said.
“I took them to their neurologists to examine them and they said to me, ‘If you would have brought them to me now, I would have never diagnosed them with Parkinson’s disease,’” he said, though he noted that the two subjects were part of a trial of FMT on a dozen Parkinson’s patients. “Only two out of the 12 responded, which means there is a lot of work to do.”
Proceeding With Caution
However, few doctors will offer FMTs outside FDA approval, except in rare situations in which patients have no other options and are informed of risks and benefits. That’s the guidance spelled out in a 2020 perspective article in Medicine in Microecology.Most patients—and providers—view FMTs as natural, safe, and separate from conventional medicine, according to surveys reported in the article. In 2017, only 12 percent of those polled had knowledge of fecal transplants. Once informed, 77 percent said they would undergo the procedure if it was needed.
The procedure is often misunderstood and comes with a plethora of ethical and logistical ramifications. As awareness of FMTs grows, people with any number of conditions may consider it a possible remedy and pursue DIY transplants using stool from a healthy family member. Such tales are what motivated the Medicine in Microecology article, which highlights this concern.
“Finally, there is a need for clinicians to strive to educate and to persuade patients not to pursue FMT as a do-it-yourself procedure any more than they would perform an organ transplant or blood transfusion at home. The relative ease of the procedure does not cancel out its risks of harm. As such, upon encountering a patient who mentions considering a ‘DIY FMT,’ clinicians have an obligation to explain the real risks and to counsel against such a course of action,” the authors wrote.
Many Unknowns of FMT
All the hype may be blinding some to the unknowns associated with FMTs, such as unintended changes in the microbiome that could lead to acute infections or chronic disease. Six patients contracted diarrhea-causing Escherichia coli infections after receiving donor stool for C. diff treatment in 2020.Root Cause Still Ignored
There’s another concern: An FMT does nothing to address poor choices, environmental exposures, and lifestyles that may have caused or contributed to dysbiosis in the first place.“I would hope the market for fecal transplant doesn’t skip over the notion that you got sick for a reason and let’s try to figure out what led to you getting sick so some changes can be made,” Dr. Doughty said.
Why Dysbiosis Is a Growing Concern
It’s widely believed that industrialization has reduced microbiome diversity due to diet, herbicides, antibiotic usage, increased use of cesarean section and baby formula, over-sanitization, and reduced contact with soil and animals.One very new discovery comes from a deep sequencing of the genomes from Hadza tribe stool samples collected a decade ago. New technology applied to the old samples allowed researchers to identify more species present in the microbiomes of one of the last remaining hunter-gatherer populations who live in Tanzania. They had an average of 730 species, compared to microbiome samples from California (277 species), Napali foragers (317), and Napali agrarians (436 species).
“The data generated from Hadza fecal samples in this study (collected in 2013–2014) may thus represent a critical permanent reference point for microbiome scientists to understand the impacts of industrialization on the gut microbiome,” according to the study.
The research found that Treponema succinifaciens—previously associated with a nonindustrialized lifestyle—is nearly completely absent from industrialized individuals. No Spirochaetota genomes were detected within Californian microbiomes.
The authors note that these are likely linked to the rapid change in our lifestyles and dysbiotic microbiome, “which promote the etiology of chronic diseases.”