The Core of the Study—Could Food Fix Health Care?
The research was conducted through the Diabetes, Obesity, and Cardiovascular Disease Microsimulation model. This computer simulation tool allowed researchers to create a data-driven model of what a national produce prescription program could look like and what its effects would be.Produce programs aim to get people eating higher quality foods, specifically fruits and vegetables, which offer a complex nutrient profile of synergistic compounds, vitamins, minerals, fiber, and more.
The proposed program would serve free or discounted fruits and vegetables to eligible diabetics aged 40 to 79. It’s designed to resolve the connection between Type 2 diabetes and elements such as lower socioeconomic status, food insecurity, and the shortage of nutritious options for people in urban areas that don’t have nearby supermarkets with fresh produce.
The simulation found that implementing a produce prescription program for nearly 6.5 million U.S. adults with diabetes and food insecurity could prevent 292,000 cardiovascular events over the next 25 years.
Participants in the simulated social program boosted their daily fruit and vegetable consumption by 0.8 servings on average. This incremental change brought about a modest decline in body mass index.
Participants also recorded lower levels of hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c), a key measure of blood sugar management over an extended period. This drop reflects the potential for better management of blood sugar—a key health marker, especially for people with diabetes.
Co-senior author Dariush Mozaffarian, a renowned cardiologist and professor of nutrition at the Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, praised the potential of produce prescriptions.
But what do these improvements mean in the broader scope of life quality? The researchers quantify these improvements using a metric called “Quality-Adjusted Life-Years” (QALYs), which is a measure of years lived with good health. The study showed a gain of 260,000 QALYs among the 40- to 79-year-olds the program would target.
While the program’s roll-out would cost an estimated $44.3 billion, including patient screening, nutrition education, and administrative costs, the potential savings overshadow the investment at an estimated $44.4 billion in health care and productivity cost.
Even when evaluated over shorter periods such as 5 and 10 years, the program would cost $18,100 for each QALY gained. This figure is lower than that of many traditional health care interventions.
Notably, the benefits of the intervention were broadly distributed, with results consistent across the population—regardless of age, race, ethnicity, education level, and insurance status.
High Cost of Chronic Illness in US
Despite its standing as a global leader in health care spending, the United States has a population in deteriorating health—with nearly 60 percent having at least one chronic ailment. Diet-related afflictions alone represent nearly a fifth of the country’s yearly health care expenditures.How Produce Prescriptions Are Revolutionizing Health Care
A recent initiative targeting people with Type 2 diabetes in rural northwestern U.S. health centers demonstrated promising results within a time frame of only four weeks.The program’s effect was most notably seen in the significant drop in participants’ HbA1C levels. A striking 76 percent of participants started the program with dangerously high HbA1C levels. By the program’s conclusion, this figure had plummeted to just 41 percent.
Private health care players are also bolstering this innovative approach to health. A notable example is Geisinger Health, which has been working to extend its Fresh Food Farmacy program, mainly targeting people with diabetes and those experiencing food insecurity.
Moreover, the White House announced a new National Strategy on Hunger, Nutrition, and Health on Sept. 28, 2022. This strategy emphasizes testing produce prescription programs in Medicaid, Medicare, Veterans Affairs, and the Indian Health Service.
Organizations such as Kaiser Permanente, the American Heart Association, the Rockefeller Foundation, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the American College of Lifestyle Medicine have also committed substantial resources and training efforts, firmly endorsing the “food is medicine” concept.
Logistical difficulties from transportation and child care to unreliable communication channels with patients can hamper patient engagement, making the delivery of these programs a demanding task. Overcoming these challenges is critical to unlocking the full potential of these initiatives in the fight against chronic diseases.
The potential benefits of the “food as medicine” concept could be transformative for society—potentially marking a profound shift in our approach to health and wellness care.
“These innovative treatments are exciting because they can not only improve health and reduce health care spending, but also reduce disparities by reaching those patients who are most in need,” Dr. Mozaffarian said.