Policies & Impacts

A federal appeals court previously ruled the dismissed lawsuit could move forward.

President Donald Trump’s proclamation cites Chad’s high visa overstay rates in 2022 and 2023 as ‘unacceptable.’

The struggle hit a fever pitch after a transgender identifying high school student competed in, and won, multiple girls’ state events.

The FBI deputy director said that demonstrators should ‘choose wisely’ and that immigration enforcement operations will continue.

Many homeowners avoid selling because of high capital gains taxes, prompting real estate professionals to call for changes.

She served as the undersecretary of the Air Force during the Biden administration.

More than half the world’s server farms are already operating in the United States, with thousands more being planned.

A federal appeals court declined last year to block the District of Columbia’s ammunition law.

After Democrats blocked a bill to keep boys from competing in girls’ sports, Oregon House Republicans immediately sent a letter to DOJ and urged federal action.

White House clashes with forecasters over how the legislation will change the deficit over the next 10 years.

Three justices dissented from the court’s two new rulings.

The Transportation Department says prior rules illegally relied on electric vehicles to set fuel economy standards and signals coming changes.

A federal appeals court previously ruled that the company had no right to appeal a ruling that aimed to halt the lawsuit.

Crime and immigration were among the vulnerabilities highlighted by speakers at WelcomeFest, which was interrupted by ‘Gays Against Genocide.’

The university accused the Trump administration of trying to circumvent a previous court order blocking the revocation of its foreign student visa program.

The case involves blind people claiming bias because they can’t use LabCorp’s self-service kiosks.

A divided lower court previously ruled Catholic Charities is not exempt from unemployment tax because it is not ‘operated primarily for religious purposes.’

Petitioner Marlean Ames argued some courts of appeals unfairly add an extra legal burden in employment discrimination cases.