Zelenskyy Rips NATO
NATO members expressed their support for Ukraine's membership in the alliance. However, the communiqué issued at the summit did not provide a specific timeline for the accession.
The member nations stated, "We will be in a position to extend an invitation to Ukraine to join the Alliance when Allies agree and conditions are met."
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who also attended this year's summit, voiced his frustration over the absence of a clear timeline.
His remarks, calling NATO's plan "unprecedented and absurd," made the biggest headlines during the summit. The following day, the United States and Group of Seven (G7) leaders issued a joint declaration, agreeing to provide Ukraine with security guarantees instead.
According to the joint declaration, each country will individually negotiate long-term security arrangements with Ukraine to offer military aid, training, intelligence sharing, and cyber support so that the country can defend itself and deter future attacks.
However, Mr. Zelenskyy remained firm in his desire for a clear path to NATO membership rather than security guarantees.
In Helsinki, Mr. Biden said that Ukraine would be admitted to the alliance but that the timing had yet to be determined.
"No one can join NATO while a war is going on where a NATO nation has been attacked because that guarantees that we’re in a war—and we’re in a Third World War," he said.
Spending Target
In another development touted as a win by the Biden administration, NATO members committed to raising the defense spending target.
NATO countries made a pledge nearly a decade ago to allocate 2 percent of their GDP to defense spending, but only seven countries met this target last year. President Donald Trump pushed hard during his term to get the other members to spend more and succeeded to an extent.
This year’s summit communiqué suggested that the 2 percent goal should be considered a minimum requirement rather than an upper limit, in line with Washington’s long-standing request.
Although the White House swiftly claimed victory over the agreement, the language used in the communiqué lacks precision by not specifying a definitive deadline for countries to meet this target.
Sources familiar with the negotiations told The Epoch Times that the initial draft of the communiqué included a provision that mandated members to "immediately" increase their defense spending beyond 2 percent. However, at the request of Western European countries like Italy, this wording was ultimately removed in the final version of the statement.
During this year's NATO summit, a bipartisan congressional delegation urged President Biden to put more pressure on allies on this matter. In a letter addressed to Mr. Biden, the senators expressed the concerns of American citizens who question why the burden of Europe's defense has disproportionately fallen on the United States for decades.
"I think it’s realistic for everybody to [boost spending] if they have the will. And the broader issue is that we want NATO to be sustainable—to be here—for another 75 years," U.S. Senator Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska), who was part of the delegation, told me in Vilnius.
The China Threat
The communiqué this year took a strong stance against China, condemning Beijing's growing global ambitions.
According to Sen. Pete Ricketts (R-Nebraska), who attended the summit as part of the congressional delegation, NATO has an interest in deterring China, especially after the "no limits" partnership declared by Moscow and Beijing last year.
However, it is unclear whether all members are on the same page when it comes to addressing security threats from China.
"There are 31 different members, and so there are probably 31 different perspectives on this," Mr. Ricketts told me in Vilnius.